Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 11:59:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Arnold <tom@inna.net> To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@mindbender.serv.net> Cc: Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>, Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com>, hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970417115214.25402B-100000@caught.inna.net> In-Reply-To: <199704160747.AAA04872@MindBender.serv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against
> something else? The stats do nothing for me all by themselves.
> Thanks.
Chips I have on hand : K5-133, K6-166, Cyrix 6x86-166. I will re-bench
all of them on the same board.
If you have benchmarks other then Nsieve and FLOPS you'd like to see run
I'll run them too. I expect to be able to do this tonight.
+-----------------------------------------------+
: Tom Arnold - No relation to Rosanne :
: SysAdmin/Pres - TBI, Ltd ( inna.net ) :
: The Middle Peninsula's Internet Connection :
+-----------------------------------------------+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.970417115214.25402B-100000>