Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:19:39 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <199902282119.OAA81564@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:15:03 PST." <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> References: <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> <199902281648.JAA80190@harmony.village.org> <199902281707.BAA63212@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : ALSO, don't forget that just getting a FreeBSD'ized EGCS is just the : first step. We will have to test ``build world'' many times and I'm sure : we will have to change base code to compile as we like with EGCS. The : more people that are allowed to get involved with this the faster things : will go. I really want to be involved in this. I'm quite keen on having a newer, cross-compile friendlier compiler in the tree. Point me at something, and I'll test it. BTW, do we need to update binutils? Or are they new enough? I know that my needs for binutils are covered by the missing bits in the current version we have in the tree. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902282119.OAA81564>