Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:19:46 +0700 (ALMST)
From:      Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>
To:        Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003281012350.58962-100000@lion.butya.kz>
In-Reply-To: <20000327180956.L18325@holly.calldei.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote:

> On Monday, March 27, 2000, Boris Popov wrote:
> > 	While this may help in the non-devfs case it is not valid for
> > devfs, because devfs is able to handle such things natively and union
> > mount is just an additional overload.
> 
>    At its current pace, however, devfs will be complete and ready
> for production roughly 30 minutes after the Sun explodes.

	I've done some work to improve devfs code, right now all my spare
time dedicated to smbfs and I'll return to devfs after initial release of
smbfs.

--
Boris Popov





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10003281012350.58962-100000>