Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:01:02 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>, Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: eugen@grosbein.pp.ru, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <200302051201.02183.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20030205175427.A15708@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030205224625.A1356@grosbein.pp.ru> <20030205174738.467c0e9d.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> <20030205175427.A15708@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[CC trimmed] On Wednesday 05 February 2003 11:54 am, Wilko Bulte wrote: = On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:47:38PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: = > Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> wrote: = > > It is the fact that Matt has a history of repeated abusive = > > behavior to his fellow committers brought core to this decision. = > > It might be interesting to know that Matt has lost his commit bit = > > before, temporarily in that case. = > For certain values of abusive. This wouldn't be a problem for, e.g. = > the OpenBSD people. -core has set a threshold and that's what this = > is about, nothing more. If this was OpenBSD we'd be happily throwing = > stones at each other. = So? Do you prefer the stone throwing or not? Most FreeBSD people = appear adverse from stones being deployed this way :) There still is, and will be, stone/banana peel/egg/tomato throwing. Miguel's point, I think, was about our maximum tolerated size of the projectiles, and how OpenBSD's limit seems higher to him. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302051201.02183.mi%2Bmx>