Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 05:58:35 -0700 From: soralx@cydem.org To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD branches stats Message-ID: <200610230558.35558.soralx@cydem.org> In-Reply-To: <ehib5j$j27$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20061021190315.7aa63143.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> <200610231140.k9NBeBK9049488@lurza.secnetix.de> <ehib5j$j27$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > > > However, the number for 2.x systems seems a bit high indeed. > > I think the users who still run 2.x systems tend to tune > > them manually and watch the lists closely for things that > > need to be patched. > > Or the script is picking maybe NetBSD or OpenBSD, both of which had 2.x > versions comparatively recently? precisely freebsd 2.2.7 an newer were far more popular than 2.1 (which is in the stats) [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610230558.35558.soralx>