Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:36:28 +0200 From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com> To: lveax <lveax.m@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 Message-ID: <b41c75520707170636u116aa48fr99dfacc11945c922@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <576dcbc20707170624kb671fe4ia5ddac21af93eccd@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> <b41c75520707170318r2152b9f0l8d2ec7ea592fe450@mail.gmail.com> <469CACEC.1000103@freebsd.org> <b41c75520707170618o4106de94g57e60d2c93a68329@mail.gmail.com> <576dcbc20707170624kb671fe4ia5ddac21af93eccd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > sched_ule: > > > > -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23 > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38 > > -j 5 buildkernel: 12:41 > > -j 6 buildkernel: 12:47 > > > > sched_4bsd: > > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 > > > > So sched_ule seems to handle more processes slightly better than 4bsd > > albeit it does it slower. ule's sweet spot is -j 4 and 4bsd is -j 3. > > > > 4bsd vs ULE > > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 vs -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23 > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 vs -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38 > > > ULE is always slower? In my case yes. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520707170636u116aa48fr99dfacc11945c922>