Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:52:59 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.7-PRERELEASE FAILING!! Message-ID: <200209191652.g8JGqxms015340@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20020919164416.GA200@leafy.idv.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:44:16 +0800 >From: JY <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> >Another thing is that man SH(1) still lists "&&" as valid operator. Shouldn't that be changed beforehand? ?? Why should that be changed? && is still a valid operator; it just doesn't make sense for the part on the left of && to be backgrounded. Cheers, david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org To paraphrase David Hilbert, there can be no conflicts between the discipline of systems administration and Microsoft, since they have nothing in common. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209191652.g8JGqxms015340>