Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:45:04 +0200 From: Lefteris Tsintjelis <lefty@ene.asda.gr> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? Message-ID: <3DD6F4A0.124A3322@ene.asda.gr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Reading helps for sure, I can't argue with that. However, a name such
as -to-become-stable would help most to realize what really is with
the first look).
Regards,
Lefteris Tsintjelis
Peter Hoskin wrote:
>
> Because this is development of what will become stable. Always helps to
> read the documentation.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hoskin
>
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:19:28 +0200
> > From: Lefteris Tsintjelis <lefty@ene.asda.gr>
> > To: Peter Hoskin <peterh@ripewithdecay.com>
> > Cc: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>, Hununu <hununu@netcabo.pt>,
> > freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS?
> >
> > It sure is misleading. Why is it called -stable then? You would expect
> > to stand up to its name.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lefteris Tsintjelis
> >
> > Peter Hoskin wrote:
> > >
> > > STABLE is still a development branch. The name is misleading. If I were
> > > you, I'd install & run release.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Hununu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 16 Nov 2002 at 13:47, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Am I expecting too much from FreeBSD-STABLE? Would I fair better if I
> > > > > > > moved down into RELENG_4_7 and avoided -STABLE altogether?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think you're expecting too much from -stable. -stable is kind of a
> > > > > > misnomer; read the Handbook section 21.2.2.1 ("What Is FreeBSD-STABLE?")
> > > > > > for more. Your conclusion above is addressed there (spoiler: don't use
> > > > > > -stable in production unless your test environment convinces you that it
> > > > > > will work).
> > > > >
> > > > > Exactly. I have some boxes that run -stable. Though, I cvsup and install
> > > > > world & kernel on one box I can afford to fail. If it works ok, then I
> > > > > slowly move it to others.. -STABLE is not meant to be rock solid, and
> > > > > running it on production servers can be time-consuming for various
> > > > > reasons.
> > > >
> > > > The thing is, I run -STABLE on about a dozen desktops and servers at my
> > > > day job, and have never had a problem ... but they don't carry near as
> > > > much load as venus/jupiter do ...
> >
> >
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DD6F4A0.124A3322>