Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:27:14 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: EchoB <echobinary@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XEN and ZFS Status? Message-ID: <86ir1j6kbh.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170801241115y76983629re25eb9dda0227729@mail.gmail.com> (Kip Macy's message of "Thu\, 24 Jan 2008 11\:15\:47 -0800") References: <4797B923.6030400@gmail.com> <86odbbwo02.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4798B651.7000108@samsco.org> <868x2f86pp.fsf@ds4.des.no> <b1fa29170801241115y76983629re25eb9dda0227729@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> writes: > I think Scott's irritation may stem from the fact that reality > contradicts your statements. The reality is that there is *zero* support for Xen in CVS. What is or is not in Perforce is completely irrelevant when what the OP asked about was, and I quote, "the production status of Xen and ZFS when 7.0 is released". You and Scott and many others may wish it were otherwise, but it isn't. Yelling at me and blacklisting me on your mail server won't change it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ir1j6kbh.fsf>