Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:28 GMT From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports Message-ID: <200605081420.k48EKSPr062867@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/96639; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:18:42 +0300
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 05:12:29PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-05-08 16:57, Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:51:41PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> On 2006-05-04 08:10, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> > Looks fine, here is a slightly modified version:
> >> >
> >> > + <title>Removing an Existing Port</title>
> >> > +
> >> > + <qandaentry>
> >> [...]
> >> > + <para>However, there is a
> >> > + <command>ports/Tools/scripts/rmport</command> script
> >> > + that automates all the necessary steps for removing a port.
> >> > + It was written by &a.vd;, who is also the current maintainer
> >> > + so please send questions/patches about
> >> > + <command>rmport</command> to him.</para>
> >> > + </answer>
> >>
> >> Since `rmport' is an alternative way of removing a port, how about the
> >> following minor rewording of the above paragraph?
> >>
> >> <para>Alternatively, you can use the <command>rmport</command> script,
> >> from <filename role="directory">ports/Tools/scripts</filename>.
> >> This script has been written by &a.vd;, who is also its current
> >> maintainer, so please send questions, patches or suggestions about
> >> <command>rmport</command> to him.</para>
> > Sounds good.
> >
> >>
> >> Also, is anyone going to commit the changes of this PR? They look like
> >> a useful addition to the docs. Let's not leave them to rot in Gnats for
> >> too long :-)
> >
> > Well, I guess one needs a doc commit bit to do so?
>
> Or a review from a doc-committer. You have mine already. Or, I can
> do the doc-build test & commit work, if you are satisfied with the
> current version of the patch :)
>
Ok, I am satisfied with the current version of the patch.
If you do not commit it within the next 24 hours (or so) I will do it
myself using Approved by: you
Have a nice day!
--
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605081420.k48EKSPr062867>