Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:43:17 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>, kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307144201.M18433@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpisuvp0vu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> <xzpisuvp0vu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> writes: > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is > > with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and > > not -STABLE. > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. Agreed ... -SECURITY is less stable then -STABLE in my environment ... been there, done that, got the t-shirt ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030307144201.M18433>