Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services Message-ID: <199907010637.XAA44203@apollo.backplane.com> References: <65911.930810321@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> How about this.... what does Linux assign radius to?
:
:Good question. I did some sniffing around and found:
:
:slackware 3.0: Don't contain a radius entry in /etc/services
:S.U.S.E. 6.1: 1645/1646 (old entries)
:Debian 2.2 / Red Hat 6.0: 1812/1813 (new entries) with old entries under
: "old radius"
:
:- Jordan
Ok, then I'll change my opinion: Since the new RFC's seem to
agree with the mainstream linux distributions ( Red Hat & Debian ),
we should bring our radius entries into agreement as well.
(If they had disagreed I would have thrown up my hands :-))
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907010637.XAA44203>