Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 05:27:09 +0000 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail(2) man page Message-ID: <20020526052710.1AD053E5E@turbine.trit.org> In-Reply-To: <20020526010802.D59365-200000@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>; from andy@siliconlandmark.com on "Sun, 26 May 2002 01:16:41 -0400 (EDT)"
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> wrote: > I was reading the jail(2) man page and came across the following: > > Further jail() calls chroot(2) internally, so the it can fail for all the > same reasons. Please consult the chroot(2) manual page for details. > > I think what was intended was: > > Further jail() calls chroot(2) internally, so that it can fail for all the > same reasons. Please consult the chroot(2) manual page for details. "so that" makes failing sound like a goal rather than a possible consequence; I think getting rid of the "the" after "so" has the desired effect, though, and I've just fixed it in -current. Thanks for noticing and reporting this error! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020526052710.1AD053E5E>