Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:51:54 -0500 From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> To: "Mike Makonnen" <mtm@identd.net>, "Jens Rehsack" <rehsack@liwing.de> Cc: FreeBSD-Current List <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfsautomatically Message-ID: <0cca01c3561b$a1230b40$13fd2fd8@Admin02> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030729124628.75304H-100000@fledge.watson.org><3F26AA16.5030007@liwing.de> <20030729172122.GA5005@kokeb.ambesa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Mike Makonnen" <mtm@identd.net> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail. Otherwise, you risk > > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment. I suspect a > > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a necessary > > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the > > >right devfs contents. > > > > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes > > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without > > prove it first) > > Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final > patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll > dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the > two. > I thought I had submitted my final patch, the only thing left was what number to use for the default jail devfs rule. We also need a way to load user defined devfs rules. I'll need to re-cvs diff my current devfs and jail scripts, before I'll be able to send them again. Scot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0cca01c3561b$a1230b40$13fd2fd8>