Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:57:17 -0700 From: Eddie Fry <eddie@eaznet.com> To: Jacob Suter <jsuter@linus.intrastar.net>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster 3 Message-ID: <33D289BD.467D2BC6@eaznet.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970720003855.22565A-100000@lightning.tbe.net> <33D1AEE7.B3D1DDFC@linus.intrastar.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jacob, Jacob Suter wrote: > Were the USR-TC's on the CT1's or were they on > analog? If they were > not They were on analog lines. Do you think it may be a problem with the telco? Some of our users aren't having any problems at all. Although, I haven't seen any logins at > 28.8k. Hmmm... Eddie > on the same CT1's, I'd start bitching out the > telco. Also, try > testing > other versions of the ComOS (3.5b8 is good and > has 33.6k code). If > Livingston & Lucent would get on the ball the > entire problem would > leave, as Lucent already has (supposibly) good > software for their > DSP's. > > JS > > Gary D. Margiotta wrote: > > > > I have a confusing problem. I've recently > installed a PM3 with > > ComOS > > > 3.5.1b20 on a channelized T-1. A lot of my > customers now complain > > that > > > they keep getting disconnected from the > network or they get > messages > > > > > when they log in that they cannot establish > a network connection. > > We > > > were previously using a USR Total Control > and these customers had > no > > > > > problems. Does anybody have any ideas? > > > > Honestly, go search the Portmaster-users > mailing list at > > Livinston....I > > was on the list for a while and there were > many similar problems > like > > the > > one you are having...I don't remember what > exactly it was that was > the > > > > problem in most cases, but it might've been > buggy code...I think > > 3.5.1b8 > > was the most stable one they had at that time. > > > > > -Gary Margiotta > > TBE Internet Services > > http://www.tbe.net --------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <HTML> Jacob, <P>Jacob Suter wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Were the USR-TC's on the CT1's or were they on analog? If they were <BR>not</BLOCKQUOTE> They were on analog lines. Do you think it may be a problem with the telco? Some of our users aren't having any problems at all. Although, I haven't seen any logins at > 28.8k. <P>Hmmm... <P>Eddie <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <P>on the same CT1's, I'd start bitching out the telco. Also, try <BR>testing <BR>other versions of the ComOS (3.5b8 is good and has 33.6k code). If <BR>Livingston & Lucent would get on the ball the entire problem would <BR>leave, as Lucent already has (supposibly) good software for their <BR>DSP's. <P>JS <P>Gary D. Margiotta wrote: <P>> > I have a confusing problem. I've recently installed a PM3 with <BR>> ComOS <BR>> > 3.5.1b20 on a channelized T-1. A lot of my customers now complain <BR>> that <BR>> > they keep getting disconnected from the network or they get <BR>messages <BR>> <BR>> > when they log in that they cannot establish a network connection. <BR>> We <BR>> > were previously using a USR Total Control and these customers had <BR>no <BR>> <BR>> > problems. Does anybody have any ideas? <BR>> <BR>> Honestly, go search the Portmaster-users mailing list at <BR>> Livinston....I <BR>> was on the list for a while and there were many similar problems <BR>like <BR>> the <BR>> one you are having...I don't remember what exactly it was that was <BR>the <BR>> <BR>> problem in most cases, but it might've been buggy code...I think <BR>> 3.5.1b8 <BR>> was the most stable one they had at that time. <BR>> <BR>> -Gary Margiotta <BR>> TBE Internet Services <BR>> <A HREF="http://www.tbe.net">http://www.tbe.net</A></BLOCKQUOTE>; </HTML> --------------0389614EC5F5F76870556C7A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33D289BD.467D2BC6>