Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:39:59 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Scot Elliott <scot@tweetie.online.barbour-index.co.uk> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD can't find 32M of my 48M without help Message-ID: <29268.890595599@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Mar 1998 19:34:12 GMT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980322192953.372A-100000@tweetie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software support wrote: > > > I didn't think the MAXMEM was required for under 64M. > > > > Machine is a Compaq P/166. > > > > [ and other stuff ] > > All my machines with more than 64M (some 128M and 96M machines) report the > correct amount of RAM when they boot. Does this mean they're actually Which is what's supposed to happen. I find Drew's report almost inexplicable and quite disturbing - I'd thought that our memory sizing problems were things of the past. > So is it OK at the minute or should I tell it how much its got? If the size reported is OK, you're OK. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29268.890595599>