Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:21:10 +0200
From:      ted@tednet.nl (Ted Lindgreen)
To:        Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, Ted Lindgreen <ted@tednet.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Recent change in less(1)
Message-ID:  <200708110821.l7B8LAWY000496@omval.tednet.nl>
In-Reply-To: "Daniel Eischen's message as of Aug 10, 14:44"

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Quoting Daniel Eischen, on Aug 10, 14:44, in "Re: Recent change in ..."]
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
> 
> > [Quoting Daniel Eischen, on Aug  7, 15:41, in "Re: Recent change in ..."]
> > ....
> >>> If so I have a question: how to obtain the former behaviour of the -e
> >>> switch, i.e. quit when EOF is hit twice always (thus whether or not
> >>> when the file happens to fit on a single page)?
> >>
> >> Perhaps:
> >>
> >>  	if (less_is_more) {
> >>  		no_init = TRUE;
> >>  		if (get_quit_at_eof())
> >>  			quit_if_one_screen = TRUE;
> >>  	}
> >
> > Daniel, are you going to check this fix in?
> >
> > (Or must we live with broken "-e" functionality in future, in which
> > case at least the man-page should be updated to reflect the new
> > behaviour IMHO).
> 
> I don't know.  Does it work the way it is suppose to with this
> patch?

Above patch indeed fixes the problem I have reported, i.e. it
restores the original behaviour of the "-e" functionality of
less(1).

regards,
-- ted



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708110821.l7B8LAWY000496>