Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200 From: Vladislav Prodan <universite@ukr.net> To: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re[2]: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1 Message-ID: <1391034285.808273914.tglqx9fb@frv35.ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com> References: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf. > > > Regards, > -- > Josh Smith > KD8HRX > I just do not know other ways to natd and tablearg for 20k IP. Can offer a how-to which direction to go? -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1391034285.808273914.tglqx9fb>