Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:12:57 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <86ab0n2kdi.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> (Ed Schouten's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:26:57 %2B0200") References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> writes: > Hi all, > > At the DevSummit in Cambridge we briefly discussed including tmux(1) in > the base system. We recently had window(1) there, but unfortunately > window(1) was a very limited tool, compared to tools like screen(1) and > tmux(1). Why tmux(1) and not screen(1)? Well, simple. The first has a > better license and very active maintenance. I think some simple tool like dtach(1) but with BSD-friendly license would be better suited for base system. And unlike mg(1) which is preferable to have in /rescue I don't think there is a reason to have tmux(1) in base other than avoiding ports.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ab0n2kdi.fsf>