Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:22 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20080521080422.GA69849@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805210101470.4552@ora.chd.net> References: <200805191106.m4JB6oBF011533@freefall.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805210101470.4552@ora.chd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:09:17AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2008, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote: > > >Current FreeBSD problem reports > >Critical problems > >Serious problems > > > >S Tracker Resp. Description > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not > >allow setu > >o kern/97326 emulation [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux > >emulation > >o kern/117010 emulation [linux] linux_getdents() get something like > >buffer ove > > > > about 117010... > Can somebody test this patch on amd64 and i386? > It is necessary linux_base-f8, 2.6.16, -current. can you describe the idea behind the patch? why do you think it's correct to replace fcntl64 with fcntl args? I'll take a look at this some further but I want to know the rationale behind this thnx! roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080521080422.GA69849>