Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:52:14 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ermal Lu?i <eri@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232043 - projects/pf/head/sys/contrib/pf/net Message-ID: <8665D8BA-6D91-46C6-8DFA-3B0C1F8B5D9E@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120225090936.GI23483@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202231018.q1NAISrV099085@svn.freebsd.org> <CAPBZQG0w%2BkWMC5y3r6gVGs21QjMWj89QRgy829TEjHmTPCAZmw@mail.gmail.com> <20120225090936.GI23483@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 25 Feb 2012, at 09:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > I'm about to start improving pf regarding its SMP friendlyness. The > changes are going to be so disruptive, that pretending that we are > a shared code between OpenBSD and FreeBSD won't be possible. At FOSDEM, there was some brief discussion about unifying the various firewall implementations we have, by providing a common bytecode format that all sets of firewall rules can be compiled to and (eventually) providing an LLVM-based JIT for this bytecode. If we're about to irreparably fork pf, perhaps now would be the correct time to have the discussion about exactly what is required. Davidhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8665D8BA-6D91-46C6-8DFA-3B0C1F8B5D9E>