Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:52:14 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ermal Lu?i <eri@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232043 - projects/pf/head/sys/contrib/pf/net Message-ID: <8665D8BA-6D91-46C6-8DFA-3B0C1F8B5D9E@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120225090936.GI23483@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202231018.q1NAISrV099085@svn.freebsd.org> <CAPBZQG0w%2BkWMC5y3r6gVGs21QjMWj89QRgy829TEjHmTPCAZmw@mail.gmail.com> <20120225090936.GI23483@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 25 Feb 2012, at 09:09, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > I'm about to start improving pf regarding its SMP friendlyness. The > changes are going to be so disruptive, that pretending that we are > a shared code between OpenBSD and FreeBSD won't be possible. At FOSDEM, there was some brief discussion about unifying the various firewall implementations we have, by providing a common bytecode format that all sets of firewall rules can be compiled to and (eventually) providing an LLVM-based JIT for this bytecode. If we're about to irreparably fork pf, perhaps now would be the correct time to have the discussion about exactly what is required. Davidhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8665D8BA-6D91-46C6-8DFA-3B0C1F8B5D9E>