Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 14:14:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org> To: Byung Yang <freebsd@nowcool.dhs.org> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cpu name Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911201413330.458-100000@pawn.primelocation.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911201245410.394-100000@nowcool.dhs.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote: > I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu > name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag > before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower > the optimization flag to -O? > > On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > > -On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang (freebsd@nowcool.dhs.org) wrote: > > >as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any > > >suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug) > > >I did not modify any of the source codes. > > > > I think someone else suggested lowering the optimisation level. > > > > Have you tried that yet? > > Has anyone referenced this problem with kern/12896 ? ----- Chris D. Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> | All the true gurus I've met never System/Network Administrator, | claimed they were one, and always Reality Check Information, Inc. | pointed to someone better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9911201413330.458-100000>