Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:26 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA? Message-ID: <hqs744$96i$1@dough.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD1935B.6070602@icyb.net.ua> References: <permail-20100423092856f0889e84000029f5-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> <4BD1935B.6070602@icyb.net.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 04/23/10 14:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/04/2010 12:28 Alexander Best said the following: >> has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've been using >> ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss burncd(8). i >> found it to be much easier to use and less buggy than cdrecord(1). > > burncd for CAM (SCSI, ATAPI) will be something very close to cdrecord or growisofs. How different are the interfaces? I mean - since they talk to the same device, are the differences just API / superficial or is there something fundamentally different that cannot be implemented within burncd? (I agree that burncd is very nice to have and more logical to use than cdrecord.)home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hqs744$96i$1>