Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:31:39 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SXN0duFu?= <leccine@gmail.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Message-ID: <b8592ed80909292231y61dbb8aau260f664a2370ffe8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AC2968C.6020206@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <689d500ec8c95542a53440b8a23ae773@mail.liquidphlux.com> <458792029.144491254249841202.JavaMail.root@shee.earlham.edu> <3bbf2fe10909291209h3c2b1c57se68e6030c2a5a044@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2968C.6020206@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
makes no sense to stay with freebsd for zfs: http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ I think this will not change soon. ZFS is, at this moment, the only > thing that keeps me with FreeBSD. In every other case, serving, number > crunching (oh, we need a lot of I/O performance in those number > crunching environments) and even simple desktop, Linux, mostly Ubuntu > and RedHat, outperforms FreeBSD. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- the sun shines for all
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b8592ed80909292231y61dbb8aau260f664a2370ffe8>