Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 08:59:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Larry S. Lile" <lile@stdio.com> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: tokenring@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: code updated Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980422084236.21004A-100000@heathers2.stdio.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422000801.523p-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Went and looked at the code it looks ok except for a few minor things.
> /* do we need a driver callback to frob MTU when/if it changes? */
> ifp->if_mtu=1492; /* Should be TOKENMTU or ISO88025MTU */
We should make that:
ifp->if_mtu=ISO88025MTU;
> /* 1mb hardware never left the labs */
> if (ifp->if_baudrate == 0)
> ifp->if_baudrate = 16000000; /* 1, 4, or 16Mbit default? */
Do we have any concensus on what the default badrate should be?
> /*
> * this following bit disagrees with both fddi and ethernet examples
> * fix it eventually
> */
> for (ifa = ifp->if_addrlist; ifa; ifa = ifa->ifa_next)
>
> if ((sdl = (struct sockaddr_dl *)ifa->ifa_addr) &&
[snip]
I took that code directly from /sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and changed to
constants to what seemed the appropriate ISO88025 couterparts. What
is the disagreement?
Did the iso88025_ioctl get pulled from if_tok.c? Because if it did
I just wanted to warn everybody that for some reason I have not pinned
down (lack of time) it causes ifconfig to panic my machine. Any clues
on what migh be causing it, or is it a lack of code elsewhere (tok_start,
tok_init, ...) ?
Also I should be putting out a first effort at a /sys/net/is088025.h
shortly which should contain most of the constants and such for 802.5.
Larry
lile@stdio.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-tokenring" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.980422084236.21004A-100000>