Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:16:46 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound Message-ID: <op.wg6p18uh34t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <863951nrpy.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <4FF9ECB5.5090507@FreeBSD.org> <863951nrpy.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:39:37 -0500, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no>= wrote: > What sort of benchmarks do you envision? Unlike named, unbound is > intended to serve only one client (localhost) or a small number of > clients (a SOHO). Highly disagree; we use it (ISP) as our resolving nameserver for all of =20 our customers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wg6p18uh34t2sn>