Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:41:04 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Peter Steele <psteele@maxiscale.com> Subject: Re: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? Message-ID: <200909161941.04441.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 16:12:25 Peter Steele wrote: > The problem we're having is when nfe0 comes online again, a failback occurs > making nfe0 active again. This causes a momentary network outage that we > want to prevent. Is there a way to configure the lagg device to stay with > the currently active interface, even if the MASTER interface comes back > online? Not really, unless you manually change master. However I believe this also causes a slight or even bigger network outage. Any reason you're not using loadbalance algorithm, since it seems to suit you better? -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200909161941.04441.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions>