Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:35:32 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>, Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. Message-ID: <29971.835464932@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:00:07 EDT." <Pine.OSF.3.91.960622115222.8870B-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> True, but the tcl move seems to raise other questions, doesn't it ... > like, why should we have tcl without tk? If we have tk, shouldn't we > have XFree86? No and no. I think you're unclear on the concept, actually. Tk is as much a part of TCL as /bin/true is part of the UNIX kernel. TCL is the framework, and whether you add in something like expect, tk, tclX or tcl-dp later is truly your own business. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29971.835464932>