Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 May 2003 16:03:33 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Heiko Schaefer <hschaefer@fto.de>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gbde performance question 
Message-ID:  <32877.1053439413@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 2003 14:58:34 %2B0200." <20030520144927.I60060@daneel.foundation.hs> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030520144927.I60060@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes:
>> >but i still don't see why the processes that are named gbde-something
>> >would take up _that_ much cpu time ... does that look reasonable and
>> >explicable to you?
>>
>> The crypto work _does_ take time.  I am only just starting to measure
>> how much for my GBDE paper now, so I don't really have anything
>> to compare your numbers with.
>
>well, from what i read, any modern cpu should be capable to do raw aes in
>the order of magnitude of hundreds of MB/s.

Don't confuse Mbit/sec and Mbyte/sec :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32877.1053439413>