Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:25:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Features to facilitate correctness and regression testing Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010411162424.93762A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200104110942.f3B9gJa17869@green.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > As far as enabling the non-intrusive regression instrumentation by > default, I think in -CURRENT it should be, so there should be two > options which both enable regression test instrumentation and which > enable intrusive instrumentation. In this particular case, I don't > think there's anything to lose by enabling that syscall by default as a > "non-intrusive" frob. You could always just write support for that > operation into procfs(4) ;) For "options REGRESSION" compile-time enabled system calls, is it worth introducing a <sys/regression.h>, or should they just be stuffed into other related include files? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010411162424.93762A-100000>