Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 17:10:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com Subject: Re: Soft Updates Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980509170859.5333F-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <19980510004603.A16999@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirk had some very good arguments but I forget what they were.. On Sun, 10 May 1998, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Julian Elischer: > > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem > > it's not a mount option.. > > Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect > softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not > that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /). > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #8: Tue Apr 21 02:45:53 CEST 1998 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980509170859.5333F-100000>