Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:14:46 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates on / Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901281213580.3544-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <199901281951.RAA26420@roma.coe.ufrj.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > #define quoting(Julian Elischer) > // On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > // > Is there a strong reason for softupdates be a tunefs option, instead of > // > a mount option ? This could be easily solved by a > // > // kirk has convinsing arguments against it and "He's the man" > ^^^^^^^^^ > > I got your point, but can you list these arguments ? If it's only "he > wants it this way, god only knows why", it's allright, but if there's > a technical reason, I'd like to know. > > Thanks in advance, The arguements are in the archives. And yes they do make very good sense. > Jonny > > -- > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student > jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro > "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901281213580.3544-100000>