Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:53:52 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki <mdcki@gmx.net> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: Freebsd Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <3F714D90.6010002@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309231920460.24353-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Daniel Eischen wrote: > Making -pthread a NOOP _would_ (*) break the application > in the link stage; it would be obvious when the application > failed to link with lots of unresolved pthread symbols. Yeah it would break. It would break in a way where the first thing I would suppose to be the case would be a problem with the compiler install instead of what it's supposed to tell me. I still stay by this: This is silly and annoying for someone not esp. interrested in all those wars about which thread lib is better then the other.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F714D90.6010002>