Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:48:37 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Subbsd <subbsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why vim ports have personal KNOBS for options Message-ID: <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinymz5kjuysy1dFqoOkhTmUqHVheg@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTinymz5kjuysy1dFqoOkhTmUqHVheg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote: > Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed > via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define > WITH_OPTIONS=yes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes). Life without > it is so difficult ;) Because the maintainer of the vim port has a dislike for the OPTIONS framework. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110327184837.GA36228>