Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:41:15 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>, Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. Message-ID: <2349.835465275@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:00:07 EDT." <Pine.OSF.3.91.960622115222.8870B-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>True, but the tcl move seems to raise other questions, doesn't it ... >like, why should we have tcl without tk? If we have tk, shouldn't we >have XFree86? Tk is an extension to Tcl, it is not an integral part, and since we don't have X11 as standard, we will not hav tk as standard. Easy, isn't it ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2349.835465275>