Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 15:13:23 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Serpent7776 <serpent7776@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> Subject: Re: kernel and most of userland : c : which edition? Message-ID: <44muj68ka4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20190528204823.7e227123@DaemONX> (Serpent's message of "Tue, 28 May 2019 20:48:23 %2B0200") References: <58c53e2e6bc1942004bc9f7fac7d6f80@kathe.in> <44sgsy8o40.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20190528204823.7e227123@DaemONX>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Serpent7776 <serpent7776@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, 28 May 2019 13:50:39 -0400 > Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > >> Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> writes: >> >> > which edition of c is-being/has-been used to write the majority of the >> > kernel and userland? >> > illumos people are mandating c99 for all new code and have heard about >> > them taking the efforts to migrate old code to c99 too. >> > is there any such movement in coding standards happening in >> > freebsd-land too? >> >> See "man 7 style" but the basic gist is that c99 is expected for new >> code and that updating older code to c99 is typical practice when >> changing that code for other reasons. > > $ man 7 style > No manual entry for style > > Did you mean `man 9 style`? Yes, I did. In fact, I *should* have just said "man style" because there isn't any other.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44muj68ka4.fsf>