Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:49:39 -0800 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet bonding/load balancing on fbsd 4-stable Message-ID: <E16cvfH-000EqY-00@rip.psg.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202170018540.39539-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <003501c1b7a8$4431d5f0$0500a8c0@notes> <20020217205620.GN413@overlord.e-gerbil.net> <20020218134405.A6619@ninja1.internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> The only real "cisco only" protocol is the PAgP (Port Aggregation >> Protocol) which is essentially just a FEC auto-negiotation protocol they >> made up. AFAIK noone other then Cisco actually implements this though. > Don't forget to add EIGRP and CDP to the list. -sc actually, the one with serious operational impactis inter-router aps. this has never been standardized. hence one can not have a sdh/sonet primary/protect pair coming into a pair of routers each from different vendors. but why is this on a freebsd list? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E16cvfH-000EqY-00>