Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 13:00:57 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Pyun Yong-Hyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>, d@delphij.net, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Annoying ERROR: 'wlan0' is not a DHCP-enabled interface Message-ID: <Yb9SflSP7iEhQFXx8NPWtyELL4w@g5jH1yj%2BTnAiSdLOy3xs5Jutvhc> In-Reply-To: <4EF833B7.9040704@FreeBSD.org> References: <n2Hlz4MXZMNcNzN56fSf6/or7Ig@YnbH/K3/Y1Z96RV2jTofcGuSPJI> <4EF6401E.3080902@FreeBSD.org> <20111224215649.GA12789@stack.nl> <4EF80CA7.3070303@FreeBSD.org> <ooDmUS7742YMCurT/5XDO19d%2BS4@g5jH1yj%2BTnAiSdLOy3xs5Jutvhc> <4EF82E3B.6040601@FreeBSD.org> <KjrN1twOoYYUBTKZXsHphbGonrU@g5jH1yj%2BTnAiSdLOy3xs5Jutvhc> <4EF833B7.9040704@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--iskw6J4cuOvZ6IVF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:43:35AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/26/2011 00:40, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > Doug, how that can be a failure?
>=20
> How does anything fail? Isn't that why you call it a "failure" instead
> of a "success?"
Doug, I am sorry, but let's drop the theoretical discussions about how
things are failing -- this is out of scope. Back to the message
you're replying to:
{{{
Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:20:11AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/26/2011 00:17, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > The error message "'$ifn' is not a DHCP-enabled interface" is not
> > generated when $ifn is DHCP-enabled interface,
>
> That's precisely the failure I'm concerned about.
}}}
I am translating the whole dialog to the following one:
- rea: error message "<foo> am not a cat" isn't generated when the
<foo> is a cat.
- dougb: that's the failure I am concerned about.
- rea: how this can be a failure to refuse to say "something isn't
a cat" when it _is_ a cat?
- dougb: how does anything fail? Isn't that why you call it a "failure"
instead of a "success"?
Please, tell specifically, what is the failure you're concerned about
and how it will affect people who use FreeBSD?
> But if Gleb is right and the problem is new to HEAD, when did it change,
> and why?
Doug, had you read the initial message of the thread? It is on
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/2011-November/002472.html
To ease the life, I can answer that
- the problem was introduced in r226879
- by me
- I was fixing my previous commit that generated r226464
- the purpose of r226464 was to fix the rc_force check in dhclient
script
> I get that you're motivated by the best of intentions. My concern
> remains that we're trying fix the symptom rather than the root cause.
Let me ask the simple question: what do you think is the root cause
you're talking about?
--=20
Eygene Ryabinkin ,,,^..^,,,
[ Life's unfair - but root password helps! | codelabs.ru ]
[ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC 4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ]
--iskw6J4cuOvZ6IVF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iF4EAREIAAYFAk74N8kACgkQFq+eroFS7PunLwD/eerXWVdbKl7ROXVteygLSqY1
DqdUC8ZVY7XzDmPDE3AA/1tf13KudJ4l2S/bxCMl5apBHAih45q9nuZspL1QBnxD
=PQI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--iskw6J4cuOvZ6IVF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Yb9SflSP7iEhQFXx8NPWtyELL4w>