Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:09:25 +0200 From: Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs send -R segfault, anyone else? Message-ID: <53311D58-6772-4316-9670-35C4CBB30248@exscape.org> In-Reply-To: <20090514133017.362075dhcdy7o2bs@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <08D1E6DF-89D3-4887-9234-C3DB9164D794@exscape.org> <20090514133017.362075dhcdy7o2bs@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 14, 2009, at 01:30 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> (from Thu, 14 May 2009 > 11:29:17 +0200): > >> 8-CURRENT checked out yesterday morning (CEST) or so. According to >> the svn-head-list, I *think* no relevant changes has been made >> since then. A search through the archives (gzipped text) shows very >> little about zfs send at all. > > Fix in: > http://www.nabble.com/Patch-for-%27zfs-send--R%27-core-dump-%28pr-bin-130105%29-td22106451.html > > Bye, > Alexander. Thanks! I haven't tried it out yet because of some unrelated trouble, but I suppose it'll work. (It figures that's the post is in the Feb archives when I checked May/ April/March!) Although, it makes me wonder... Why aren't trivial patches like this merged to current? I guess half the answer (or perhaps the question) is in the link above, but still... Three months and still the same bug, when a one-line patch exists? Regards, Thomas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53311D58-6772-4316-9670-35C4CBB30248>