Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: imp@harmony.village.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <199902282128.NAA12818@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <199902282119.OAA81564@harmony.village.org> References: <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> <199902281648.JAA80190@harmony.village.org> <199902281707.BAA63212@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199902282119.OAA81564@harmony.village.org>,
Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> wrote:
>
> BTW, do we need to update binutils? Or are they new enough? I know
> that my needs for binutils are covered by the missing bits in the
> current version we have in the tree.
I'm pretty sure our existing binutils are fine. They're the newest
GNU version, and they work OK with the egcs and gcc-2.8.1 ports.
John
--
John Polstra jdp@polstra.com
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public."
-- H. L. Mencken
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902282128.NAA12818>