Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 12:02:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com> To: gback@cs.utah.edu Cc: swindellsr@genrad.co.uk, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Daemonising a Java Process: Possible? Message-ID: <13814.45985.615741.660509@compound.east> References: <199809090938.CAA12739@hub.freebsd.org> <199809091527.JAA13391@sal.cs.utah.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Godmar Back on Wed, 9 September: : : On one hand, you're saying you want to avoid legal trouble because : the port might give away information about Sun's JVM internals. : On the other hand, you're intending to offer the source back to : Transvirtual. : It seems worthwhile to point out that compatibility changes to kaffe jit to conform to the public interface and changes to conform to non-public interfaces fall into different categories. Kaffe is untainted by license violation if the former are folded in, although no long truly "clean-room" if the author(s) are jdk licensees, but would be tainted (absent explicit permission from the jdk owner) by inclusion of the latter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13814.45985.615741.660509>