Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:42:46 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl>
Subject:   Re: /boot/boot.rc && /boot/rc.d 
Message-ID:  <6086.915561766@zippy.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jan 1999 03:18:40 %2B0900." <36925780.75AB6581@newsguy.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I was thinking about possible on-comings "patches" in boot.rc
> (currently known as boot.conf :), when I realized that for
> third-party drivers or ports making use of loader it would better to
> source files from a boot/rc.d directory.
> 
> Is this already planned?

We hadn't really thought this far ahead, but I see no reason why
following such a "hook chain" couldn't be a part of the system.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6086.915561766>