Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:11:58 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CfR: config chapter changes Message-ID: <20120215041158.GC1862@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <20120215040311.GB1862@glenbarber.us> References: <CAF6rxgnvyoibFt7ijm6GpWoeF-eAOLu3SgvhEGCBDUAV4grybw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1202120028440.882@multics.mit.edu> <CAF6rxgmPyVXSFRJiOZZaJQFObhCsZMHS5_5UneVrb3t=wznMhA@mail.gmail.com> <20120215040311.GB1862@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:03:11PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > @@ -547,11 +548,8 @@ > > day of the week. All these fields must be numeric values, and follow > > the twenty-four hour clock. The <literal>who</literal> field is special, > > and only exists in the <filename>/etc/crontab</filename> file. > > - This field specifies which user the command should be run as. > > - When a user installs his or her <filename>crontab</filename> file, they > > - will not have this option. Finally, the <literal>command</literal> > > option is listed. > >> - This is the last field, so naturally it should designate the command > > - to be executed.</para> > > + This field specifies which user the command should be run > > + as. The last field is the command to be executed.</para> > > Grammar nit: What do you think about "This field specifies the user > <username>root</username> under which the command should run." ? > Wording issue on my part. What I meant was: "This field specifies the user under which <username>root</username> should invoke the command." Glen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120215041158.GC1862>