Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:43:57 +0200 From: Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2 Message-ID: <b41c75520504190443187617de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4264EC60.3020600@centtech.com> References: <b41c75520504190418308f94cc@mail.gmail.com> <4264EC60.3020600@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Q: > > Will I get better performance upgrading the server from dual PIII to du= al Xeon? > > A: >=20 > rsync is CPU intensive, so depending on how much cpu you were using for t= his, > you may or may not gain. How busy was the server during that time? Is t= his to > a single IDE disk? If so, you are probably bottlenecked by that IDE driv= e. The storage is ide->fiber. Using tcp-mounts and peaking 100 MB/s it used just about 100 % cpu. Rsync was only used to copy the folder recursively (-a), it used nfs to trasnfer the files to the nfs-server. regards Claus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520504190443187617de>