Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:30:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "John Goodleaf" <john@goodleaf.net> To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? Message-ID: <50685.192.168.1.6.1119065443.squirrel@192.168.1.6> In-Reply-To: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org> References: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You may have better luck with this question on a different list, but I'll throw one out there. I prefer postfix. I'm not knocking qmail, which is a fine piece of software. I just think postfix is a bit cleaner and easier to configure and maintain. For my purposes it has been adequately powerful, though I believe qmail has a broader range of add-on products sitting around. J Luciano Musacchio said: > hi, > I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :), I've a fair review for > both from > some linux admins, now, I want to know fbsd's community opinion :). > The mail > server (now running sendmail) serves ~300 accounts. > > Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do > anyone > know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail? (i mean, > the > latter is far more popular, right?), > > thanks ppl > > -- > "Los buenos artistas copian, los grandes roban" -- Steve Jobs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50685.192.168.1.6.1119065443.squirrel>