Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:40:03 +0200 (EET) From: Alexander Litvin <archer@lucky.net> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Panic with CURRENT & softupdates-240298 Message-ID: <199803040740.JAA06426@grape.carrier.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.980303164538.6994B-100000@shadow.worldbank.org> <34FC7EFC.237C228A@whistle.com> <19980303222750.1133.qmail@devious.lustig.com> <34FC9BBE.6201DD56@whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <34FC9BBE.6201DD56@whistle.com> you wrote:
> NO
Well, what about soft updates being commited to CURRENT?
I mean - a lot of stuff is hanging as diffs, and cvsupping
and patching each time is a bit annoying. Not to count that
patchis are not applied cleanly sometimes.
> (though you could try... you could make it a completely removable option
> with appropriate ifdefs.)
> but the VM interactions would be different
> and the vfs interface has changed a bit.
> but it might hurt 2.2's stability.
> Barry Lustig wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone planning on back-porting soft-updates to 2.5.X?
>> barry
--
Litvin Alexander
No SIGNATURE available at this run-level
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803040740.JAA06426>