Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:33:13 -0800 (PST) From: chrish@UltimateDNS.NET To: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" <freebsd@skysmurf.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [games/ofortune] CFT and pending issues Message-ID: <116bdeb6a2577cfc5454bb057b43af09.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20131206154249.GB78659@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20131205215437.GA32134@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20131206133709.GA60741@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <0de1dbb77b9352e1546e777dbed1fee9.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131206154249.GB78659@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> chrish@UltimateDNS.NET wrote: > >>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I >>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well? >> >> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license, >> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate. > > Sounds like a good idea. Would I be right in saying that just LICENSE=BSD > is sufficient, i.e. I don't need to specify LICENSE_FILE? Greetings, /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk and /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk don't hold the clues for you? Best wishes. --Chris > > AvW > > -- > I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?116bdeb6a2577cfc5454bb057b43af09.authenticated>