Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 12:14:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Network Coordinator <nc@ai.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: Mike Pritchard <pritc003@maroon.tc.umn.edu>, wsantee@wsantee.oz.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd-* mailing lists (Was Re: SUP server down?) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950530121256.17117A-100000@aries.ai.net> In-Reply-To: <199505300915.CAA03249@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> freefall:cvswork {111} mailstats
> Statistics from Sat May 27 04:19:52 1995
> M msgsfr bytes_from msgsto bytes_to Mailer
> 0 0 0K 1026 2285K prog
> 1 0 0K 394 875K *file*
> 3 2703 6324K 3653 7964K local
> 4 1227 3585K 263175 531621K smtp
> ========================================
> T 3930 9909K 268248 542745K
> freefall:cvswork {112}
>
> I see turn around times on my messages well under 10 minutes in most
> cases, if your seeing 8 hours you probably have a DNS or route problem
> that is causing your mail to get defered :-(. That and I am at the
> top of the lists, and your probably quite far down on them depending
> on when you joined the list.
>
I must fit in the same category in terms of being far down the lists.
However, mail directly TO majordomo [stat requests, etc] come back
almost INSTANTLY. [like I hit send, hit index, and have a reply] so I
think freefall definitely has enough CPU/bandwidth free to deal with
that. I think sendmail might not exactly rush to send bulk priority mail
out though.
-Jerry.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950530121256.17117A-100000>