Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:43 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: drvince@anonymnet.net, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: nullfs fixed ? (was: More into /etc/rc.d/jail) Message-ID: <200508100000.53489@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <20050809214748.GA45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <N1-uLBXxM-zn8@Safe-mail.net> <200508092335.21889@harrymail> <20050809214748.GA45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 23:47 CEST schrieb Jeremie Le Hen: > Hi Emmanuel, > > > And you don't suffer from a big disk performance degradation with > > that? If you don't have I/O load it doesn't matter but I need usual > > I/O performance so I give each jail its own partition (GPT > > partitions). But I think some good guys are looking for fixing the > > performance issue like they already solved the nullfs problem :) > > Thanks again for that! (Jeff?) > > Are you sure that nullfs has been fixed ? In this case, the warning > at the end of mount_nullfs(8) manpage should be removed. I haven't done my own benchmarks yet, but I'm quiet sure that was fixed about two or three months ago in 6.0-current. At that time I was figuring out how to avoid nullfs, but decided to keep using it, so I was conviced that it's been solved ;) But I think Jeff can tell you more, if I don't mix up names again.... -Harry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC+SeVBylq0S4AzzwRAk5RAJwNzaE3dJbU4qIRJj/RFU1DyME7+ACeN5fs MvoevyyzhW4vIJGDnMM9mxI= =Q1Fj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508100000.53489>