Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:50:18 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nanobsd.sh change: configurable boot0 loader and configuration Message-ID: <4626767A.1050204@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4626741C.3010907@elischer.org> References: <d763ac660704180454h673296c1t75e3cba10c75d2aa@mail.gmail.com> <4626741C.3010907@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Here's a simple patch to allow boot0 parameters to be configured. >> My test embedded boxes have a VGA console which I'd like to use during >> development/debugging. >> >> Comments? > NanoBSD is a PHK thing largely (I think) > I've used tinybsd (also in the repo) but not nanoBSD > > (try it it's quicker) :-) > sorry to -current.. I didn't realise that this was a generally readable message. (I thought it was just to me as Adrian and I are friends and we have a current mail exchange going on which I thought this was a part of). I did not mean to imply that NanoBSD was not good especially mot due to any PHK connection, just that I was not a good person to review his change and that maybe phk might be a better choice of reviewer. I only realised that his email was going to -current when I got my reply back through -current.. Sorry for the noise and especially I apologise to PHK if it looks as if I am saying that nanoBSD is not good because he is connected with it.. That was not what I meant to say at all.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4626767A.1050204>